AAP are better activists than administrators.
The man who has managed to bring politics out on
the streets from the cushy rooms is now compared to Item Girl Rakhi
Sawant. RSS chief Udhav Thakrey has
claimed that Rakhi sawant can govern better than Kejriwal. Even a supporter
like Chetan Bhagat felt ashamed of Kejriwals Rail Bhavan protest and termed AAP
as an Item girl, Shinde called him Mad and NCP's DP Tripathi called them
Saap. Rakhi Sawant was believed to be a
hungry woman for fame. She thanked Thackeray for saying that she can govern
better than the Delhi CM. She believes if the Gujarat Chief Minister can run
the country by selling tea, why can't she do being an item girl. It’s not about
the political class who changed the opinion against Kejriwal .We have V Balakrishnan, ex-CFO, Infosys, Meera
Sanyal, Ex-banker, KV Sridhar, creative head, Leo Burnett, and other members of
the professional/new entrepreneurial class
who are in the AAP have to
rethink about their choice. All these entrepreneurs joined AAP for Intelligent
reform but the party seems to do a Robinhood and street justice act which may
not augur well for India to develop.
There is a clear difference between being and
activist and governing a state with all the legislative powers. If memory
serves me right, it was Arvind Kejriwal who said that as they could not achieve
everything through activism, they were planning to enter politics. So where did
that common sense that prevailed then go away now? Was it pure populist and has
he also fallen trap to the political class and completely behaving as one? It's
not a good sign and true these corporates who have joined the party now need to
really re-assess & re-think their plans and the party to which they want to
get affiliated.
Why he never thought that he was leading a street
side protest that could have snowballed into something ugly — as often happens
in India. These are genuine questions that every common man has within for
Kejriwal. I am saying common man because intellectuals have a different set of
questions and doubts . Is it a fact that in Arvind Kejrival's entire service of
20 years in Indian Revenue Service, he never served outside Delhi, even though
the norms of the service are that all IRS officers serve a posting only for 3
years in a place. Kejriwal in the reply
says that there were 276 such officers who were not transferred owing to
shortage of the IRS officers in Delhi.
He disrupted the life of people in Delhi for hours
and he threatened to disrupt Republic day parade. ISI and the maoists have been
trying to disrupt Republic day from years, then where is the difference in your
thoughts. Soldiers receives medals of bravery, small children gets their due
for saving lives of people and kejriwal calls republic day a Drama. Think of a situation if the Indian military start
protesting against AAP. Is Kejriwal cleaning the system or damaging it further?
Comments
Post a Comment